🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. The movie, though, may align so closely with the mythologized version circulated by official channels that, within Russia, it reads as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Strongman

Over a long period, the Kremlin and the country's pop-culture machine have collaborated to craft a made-to-measure persona of Putin. This character is a political superhero devoid of flaws, a former spy reframed as a Russian James Bond who always knows more than he reveals.

“Domestically, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a television show released last fall, helmed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a invented security officer selected by fate to “rescue” the nation from chaos. Although the character's name a different name, the implication is unmistakable: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals often end up buttressing this identical story rather than debunking it. An adaptation based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to subvert the leader's mythology by framing him as a symptom but as a symptom, moving the narrative weight to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

On screen, Putin is shown as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and practically plead him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, desiring permanent power.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. In reality, none of this ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody ever begged him to accept the role. The position was effectively a selection process with no shortage of candidates. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who planned to control the state de facto.

• The shortlist included various figures, including an opposition leader later murdered and a security service director.
• According to an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the chosen candidate simply fitted the required parameters: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A businessman close to the process stated the key criterion was controllability and loyalty, not leadership.

“The goal wasn't a strong candidate, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the image of Putin as a master operative was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a mid-level functionary not engaged in actual agent work.

Curiously, the move to depicting him as a “spy” could partly have been inspired by the actor's arrival as 007. His harder interpretation led Russian media and social media to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images swapping the actor's likeness with his surfaced on Moscow streets, feeding the increasing trend to see him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an star well-liked by viewers there, the authorities are likely to seize the chance to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's omission of public dissent, the opposition, or prominent activists in the story, despite covering recent years, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

Domestically, the president is often an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. He is signaled through portraits or calls “from above”. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently validate the very myths it perhaps aims to question.